Was The Leo Frank Case Treated Fairly?

Question

In The Leo Frank Murder Case Was Leo Frank Or Jim Conoly Treated Diffrently Because Of There Religion Or Colour Of Skin ect.

Answer 1

Leo Frank was lynched by the people avenging Mary Phagan , therefore he wasn't treated fairly.



The people who went on to do this formed the second phase of the KKK, under William J Simmons. So to answer your point NO!

Answer 2

For more than 100 years, there has been a concerted effort to rehabilitate Leo Frank from a fiendish and perverted sex killer into a holy religious martyr of Southern anti-Semitism, but modern scholars have solved the Mary Phagan murder mystery by using Leo Frank's testimony at the trial. The judge and jury sentenced Leo Frank to death with a vote of 13 to 0. That unanimous vote of guilt, rendered against Leo Frank, was upheld by every appeals court in the United States.



Leo Frank was sentenced to hang, three times, by three different courts during his appeals, but the outgoing Governor, John M. Slaton, commuted the June 22nd, 1913, death sentence of Leo Frank to life in prison. The leadership of the Atlanta government were so incensed by the clemency Governor Slaton gave to the serial rapist-pedophile and convicted child strangler. The anger came from the fact, Governor John Slaton, was a law partner and part owner of the firm that represented Leo Frank at his trial. So the Governor basically commuted the death sentence of his own law client. It was a grotesque conflict of interest, because the Governor was disqualified from using his executive privilege for a client.



You can read the fascinating, original Atlanta newspaper reports of Leo Frank Case, online at the Internet Archive, concerning how the case was treated in the media through, the Atlanta Constitution, Atlanta Journal and Atlanta Georgian, which also posted the trial testimony.



Leo Frank had a fair trial according to Georgia Supreme Court and United States Supreme Court. The Leo Frank trial brief of evidence, is published online.



The best sites for information on the Leo Frank case are "The Internet Archive" and "Live Leak"

Answer 3

The Leo Frank case has been used as a racist weapon against Gentiles for more than 100 years by Leo Frank's co-religionists, but now that ugly game is coming to and end, because all of the legal records of the case are now available online at "The Internet Archive". Now, the Atlanta newspaper reports on the case from 1913 are also online (Atlanta Constitution, Atlanta Journal, Atlanta Georgian, April to August, 1913). You can learn what really happened during the case reading the state and federal supreme court decisions.



There were very few dissenting opinions on the fairness of Leo Frank's trial, more than a dozen judges ruled that Leo Frank had a fair trial. A lot of closet racist academics, journalists and Jewish activists groups have taken up the Leo Frank case to viciously attack African-American and European-American Southerners and Christians, when it doesn't call for it. The Anti-Defamation League of B'nai Brith is using to case to perpetuate a racist anti-Gentile hoax that crowds of people were shouting "Hang the Jew" during the trial proceedings outside the courtroom's open windows.



Every State court and U.S. Federal court ruled in both their majority and unanimous decisions that Leo Frank had a fair trial. All the claims that Leo Frank did not have a fair trial are being propounded by racist Anti-Gentile bigots who hate Southerners and Christians.



Not only did Leo Frank have a fair trial, but 70 years after his hanging, the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles stated they would pardon Leo Frank, but not remove his officially established guilt. Leo Frank is still considered guilty today and no efforts to remove his guilt would ever be taken seriously, yet the ADL and Rabbi Steven Lebow keep trying.



What we need is to put a Governor in Georgia who will reverse the illegal pardon of Leo Frank and to ask the Jewish community to stop using the case as a racist anti-Gentile morality tale to try and shame non-Jews and create a fear-mongering culture among Jews.